#Xee3 windows 10 series#
#Xee3 windows 10 zip#
#Xee3 windows 10 mac#

Navigating and skipping a bunch of images does no trigger more the slowdown/semi freezing that i was reporting: it just does the grain for a fraction of second and it recover fastly. I think that with this version most of the loading related problems are gone for me.

I hope that some of the issues can be at least reduced, i really liked Xee and i'm more that willing to pay to a new version that can keep up on the performances. The fact that the application does not do fullscreen in the screen where the window is positioned is a bug i think: at least Preview will use as fullscreen the screen where the window currently resides, Xee always use the main screen (also it moves the window to the main screen when exiting fullscreen). A custom solution is probably harder but the actual mode is really a big step back for multiple monitors. I see that you can't do much for fullscreen, but really the osx style fullscreen is awfully bad if you have a multiple monitor setup.

#Xee3 windows 10 mac#

(note that my mac is the latest top of the line 27 imac, so i think i can rule out problems from under performing hardware)

#Xee3 windows 10 zip#

The reduced performances is noticeable when loading a image folder that has as little as 250 images, but is a lot worser for loading archived files: for example a 16 MB zip with 30 images in it will take like seven seconds to load. Is not really a problem that this effect appears during loading, the problem is that it take a long time to 'recover' from this state, often seconds where i think the application is trying to catch up by loading all the images skipped and in the during this time the application is kinda freezed. I see from comments that some things will not change, but i find that browsing rapidly even on low quality will trigger the loading grain effect very often. Unfortunately i think that the new version is in the current state too slow to be usable like it was on 2.2. I really liked Xee up version 2.2 and seeing finally a 3.0 released maked me very happy to see continued developed. Thank you for your excellent work on Xee, and I am glad to see that there is a new version in progress. 'Given (1) and (2), is there a particular reason for hypothesizing that a #2 should 'win' over #1? Is there a particular reason to hypothesize that a zoom level applied to one image will also be useful for the next one?' (2) In addition, after an image was opened in accordance with #1, the user has gone on to further apply additional zoom to one image. (1) The user has said to always begin by shrinking and stretching to fit on the screen. I think that the question might be usefully asked the other way around - is there a reason for NOT resetting? Or, to be more precise: > so I just left it at this behavior by default. To which there was the reply: > Is there a particular use for resetting the view position? I couldn't think of one > the same 'zoom position' which was an option you could disable before.'

It has 'remembered' that if I wanted to see only 1/5 of previous, then given me the same 1/5 of the next one.Ĭomment 341: said > Now the only 'big' problem I have is : 'When changing images it stays at Problem: If I zoom in on a portion of the current image, when I move to the next image, I see only the same portion of that one I am confused. Attempted to set this in the menus: FIt on screen, always fit on screen, shrink to fit, stretch to fit.

#Xee3 windows 10 series#

About zoom levels switching images, Version 3.0 beta 4 (15)ĭesired: when each image of a series comes up, shrink or expand as needed to fill the screen on this monitor and then if I wish to further adjust, I can do so.